Understanding the IEEE Conference Paper Review Process: A Step-by-Step Guide

Submitting a paper to an IEEE conference involves a rigorous review process to ensure high-quality contributions. Knowing what happens after submission can help you better prepare your paper and increase your chances of acceptance.

1. Submission of the Paper

• Authors submit their manuscripts through the conference's online submission system, such as EDAS or EasyChair.
• Submissions must meet the conference's formatting, content, and deadline requirements. Papers failing these criteria are often rejected without review.

2. Initial Screening
After submission, the paper undergoes an initial screening by the conference organizers or program chairs to check for:

• Scope Alignment: Does the paper align with the conference's themes and topics?
• Formatting Compliance: Is the paper formatted according to IEEE guidelines?
• Plagiarism Check: Tools like iThenticate are used to ensure originality and detect plagiarism. Papers with high similarity scores are rejected outright.

3. Assignment to Reviewers

• Each paper is assigned to 2-4 reviewers who are experts in the field.
• Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and familiarity with the paper's topic.
• In some cases, a track chair or session chair oversees the review process for a specific topic area.

4. Peer Review Process
IEEE conferences typically use a single-blind review process, where reviewers know the authors' identities but authors do not know the reviewers.

• Evaluation Criteria: Reviewers assess the paper based on:

  • Originality: Does the paper offer novel insights or contributions?
  • Relevance: Is the research relevant to the conference topics?
  • Technical Quality: Are the methods sound, and are the results valid?
  • Clarity: Is the paper well-written and easy to understand?
  • Significance: Does the research have potential for real-world application or further study?

• Reviewer Comments: Reviewers provide detailed feedback on the paper's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.

• Recommendations: Reviewers recommend one of the following:

  • Accept: The paper is ready for publication.
  • Minor Revisions: Small changes are required before acceptance.
  • Major Revisions: Significant changes are needed, and the paper may need to be reviewed again.
  • Reject: The paper does not meet the standards for publication.

5. Decision by the Program Committee
The program committee or session chair reviews all comments and recommendations from the reviewers. Based on the feedback, they make a final decision on the paper:

• Papers with strong recommendations are typically accepted.
• Papers needing revisions may be conditionally accepted, with authors required to address specific reviewer comments.
• Papers with poor reviews are rejected.

6. Author Notification
Authors are notified of the decision through the submission portal or email. The notification includes:

• Decision Outcome: Accept, revise, or reject.
• Reviewer Feedback: Detailed comments to help authors improve their paper, even if rejected.
• Revisions Deadline: For conditionally accepted papers, a deadline is provided for submitting the revised version.

7. Camera-Ready Submission
For accepted papers, authors must prepare a camera-ready version, adhering to all formatting and reviewer feedback. This final version is submitted for publication in the IEEE Xplore digital library.

8. Presentation at the Conference
Accepted papers are presented at the conference by one or more of the authors. Presentations can be oral or poster-based, depending on the conference format.

9. Common Challenges in the IEEE Review Process

• Strict Deadlines: IEEE conferences have non-negotiable deadlines for submission and revisions.
• High Standards: The competitive nature of IEEE conferences means that only high-quality papers are accepted.
• Formatting Errors: Papers not adhering to IEEE formatting guidelines are often rejected outright.

10. Tips for Success in the Review Process

• Follow the conference's submission guidelines meticulously.
• Address potential reviewer concerns in your paper, such as clarity, technical soundness, and relevance.
• Use tools to check for grammar, formatting, and plagiarism before submission.

Get Expert Help for Your IEEE Paper
Preparing a high-quality IEEE conference paper can be challenging. Visit academic.net for expert assistance with writing, formatting, and submission to maximize your chances of success.